PS3

Blu-Ray Player/Game System/Cash Sink Cost of average Blu-Ray player: $1,000.00 Cost of average game console: $300-500.00 Cost of PS3 (combine Blue-ray cost to console cost and then read) $600.00 Think about that. "It's cheap for what you get." ...and you get what you pay for. My point is: You're not getting a Blu-Ray player for 600 bucks. You're getting it for considerably less after you factor in all the other parts. More like $300-400. and that leaves the game system coming in at 200-300 dollars. How good do you think a 300-400 dollar blu-ray player is going to be? If not? How cheaply made is the gaming system? If a regular blue-ray costs almost double the whole PS3 package, either the player is bare-bones and made of shoddy materials (common for Sony) or all the other Blu-ray players are vastly over-priced, over-hyped and aren't worth the money (very likely). Either way, Sony is cutting HUGE corners somewhere in this thing. PS2 had one of the worst DVD players on Earth. Why? Because it was an add on. A secondary feature. Only now the secondary feature over-shadows the main event! PS3 is made to appeal to gamers looking for an image-enhancing system. The flashier and most expensive = the best. PS3 is doing so badly and is such a nasty mess, that most game companies have already pulled out of exclusive deals and taken their games multi-platform because of the orgasm of bad ideas, practices and ridiculous greed of Sony. Sony fanboys praise the system as being the most powerful despite the lack of good games. Which would hold more value if these same fanboys didn't claim that "power wasn't everything" last generation, when the PS2 was weaker than XBox (and the same for XBox fanboys)but had better games. Sorta proves they really don't have any particular qualifications for best system, other than "Sony/Microsoft made it"