Tyranny

100% authority for performance or delivery of a social good or service by one party with 0% responsibility on how and to whom that social good or service is owed and / or the manner of delivery. The opposite of slavery wherein one party (individual or group) is 100% responsible for performance or delivery of said social good or service, but has no say in how or to whom it is delivered (or even if it is owed at all). Generally, it is usually because the tyrannizing party doesn't want to engage in dangerous or difficult jobs (in the case of actual slavery), or feels entitled to a pay out because society tells them they are owed (in the case of no-fault divorces). In all cases, usually involves the indifference towards the suffering and hardship of others and an unwillingness to engage in productive labour for the benefit of others. The advantage to this definition is that it has objective criteria (authority and responsibility) that can be measured and calculated, usually on a dollar-basis or time-investment-basis.