conservapedia

A wiki, very similar to wikipedia on everything. However..i have noticed many hypocrisies and hmm, well crackpot theories. The hypocrisy which pisses me off most is that in the "Examples of Bias in wikipedia" article http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia) number 22. (out of 133 ffs)reads: "Wikipedia has an extensive entry on "Creation myth".40 Describing Creationism as a "myth" is yet another attempt to disparage Christians, and although the theory of evolution satisfies Wikipedia's definition of "myth", Wikipedia never describes it as a "myth". " Fair enough, slightly mental, but he has a point...yes? However...looking at the article on the conservapedia article "Dreamtime", an australlian aboriginal creation story; IT is described as a myth. So Christian creationism is NOT a myth but any other creationism is?? hmmm... also on the article about kangaroos (boing boing) there is a large 3 paragraph section on the Young Earth Creationist theory and only 1/2 a sentence on the evolutionary theory so the YEC theory which is probably less supported than evolution recieves more coverage than a well established and most probably correct theory.