What's on your mug?

I looked at the other definitions, and there seems to few people on here that actually know what they're talking about. So I thought I'd add mine, with a bit of history and background information... 1976 saw the birth of [punk], bringing with it many sub-genres, sub-sub-genres, and sub-sub-sub-sub-genres. In the early 80s, [punk] had branched off into several different styles, and ways of taking the genre. In 1981 there was a large amount of "[hardcore]" bands emerging from the D.C. scene. One of these bands were called "Minor Threat", who had a very vibrant, and melodic sound. Nearing the end of 1983, the band "Minor Threat" broke up, after the band seemed to "run out of steam", and their last 7" single "Salad Days" in 1984 finally killed the band, and the DC hardcore scene. After that new bands emerged, taking the genre their own way. 1984 showed the release of "Zen Arcade", an album by minneapolis band "Husker Du". This interpretation showed much more powerful, intense vocals with slow, melancholy and more melodic song writing. In Spring 1984, D.C. [Hardcore] band "Rites of Spring" emerged, taking inspiration from the earlier hardcore scene. The band brought a totally new vocal approach to Husker Du's original style. Summer 1985 became known as the "revolution summer" when a whole wave of hardcore bands emerged from the D.C. scene such as Gray Matter, Soulside, Ignition and Dag Nasty. Few bands retained the original fast paced, [hardcore] style proposed by "Rites of Spring" and "Husker Du" but took a much more droney, melodic approach to the genre. These bands were then labelled the "D.C. Sound" or "D.C. [Hardcore]", and some of them were labelled "emo". It was never suggested by Rites Of Spring that the term "emo" was short for anything. Although it has been proposed that emo was short for "emotive [hardcore]" or "emotionally charged hardcore [punk]" in a 1985 flipside interview with the band they claimed they were "not a punk rock band" and it was never mentioned in the text that they were "emotional" or "emotive" although the term "emo" was used several times. Again, people took the genre several ways. Some people took an "[Indie]-rock" approach to the genre, while others retained a "post [hardcore]" style. Many emo bands were poorly paid, underground, and rarely heard of, and few records were ever released around the genre. Which is probably why today it is so easily mistaken and misunderstood. The "D.C. hardcore scene" grew, and with it, a stereotype fashion. People with a "[Mop]-[top]" haircut, skinny t-shirts and old trainers became a classic "D.C. hardcore scene" cliche. However, not all of these were "emo fans" nor were they in any way "emo's". It is suggested that this idea was taken, and progressed through the nineties to a much more "geeky" look nowadays. However, emo is a genre of [music], argue all you like, your still wrong. Saying "I am an emo" is like saying "I am a [jazz]", which is not possible. Emo has been heavily marketed by magazines (Kerrang etc.) and a totally wrong idea of the genre is now being spread across youths. The early 90s saw a last breath for emo, with a much more softer, "[Indie]-rock" take on the genre. After that, the rest is history. It's a shame the genre was dragged through the gutter like that.

Emo - Rites Of Spring, Dag [Nasty], SDRE, Drive Like Jehu, [Fugazi]... What? - GUYS IN GIRL PANTS R HOT!!!11 Anything to do with 14 year old [girls] instantly becomes void of the possibility of it having anything to do with emo.

This definition is too long for this mug.