Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
If it came down to my baby sister and a million fluffy kittens I'd kick every helpless cat into a wall so I thought I was for animal testing... untill I researched it for a research/arguementation paper in my college course. The more cost-efficient and accurate way to test for medical advancements is in-vita (in tube cell studies) from humans, animals and even plants. For example, jack beans can be used to mimic the cornea and test for eye irritants. It's called an Eytex. Pumpkins can be used in Skintex's to imitate human skin. Not onyl that, but animals react so differently than humans that about 5% of tried and true animal tests murder thousands of people once put on shelves. Basically, if you think you're pro-animal testing then you're uneducated. Forget moral desicions and human life vs. animal life. Animal-testing kills more people than it helps. Why do it then right? The businesses make HUGE amounts of money from grants and the sale of test animals.
Text fits
Save
Cancel