Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
A stance that calls itself skeptical but operates as a dogma inverse to naive belief. While healthy skepticism questions extraordinary claims with open, provisional, self‑correcting methods, hard‑narrow skepticism—often called “pseudoskepticism” by critics—applies doubt asymmetrically, arbitrarily, and militantly. Its adherents demand rigorous evidence (preferably double‑blind RCTs, meta‑analyses) for anything outside the materialist, naturalist, reductionist paradigm, yet never apply the same scrutiny to their own underlying beliefs: e.g., that science can answer all human questions, that non‑physical phenomena do not exist, or that Western epistemology is superior. Pseudoskepticism is marked by contempt for philosophy (especially epistemology and philosophy of science), confusion between science and scientism, rhetorical use of Occam’s razor to dismiss alternatives without examination, appeal to scientific authority as final truth, and personal attacks against dissenters, calling them “trolls,” “deniers,” “relativists,” or “charlatans.” In practice, the hard‑narrow skeptic does not investigate—he already knows what is “pseudoscience” and acts as an inquisitor, not an inquirer. It parodies skepticism by transforming it into a faith in disbelief.
Text fits
Save
Cancel