Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
Logical fallacy around the mantra “Never assume malice when stupidity will suffice”. In reality, acting like “Whoops, sorry! Stoopid me!”, so the victim is willing to forgive you for longer, is the oldest trick in the book of evil. Mostly used by anxious sheltered people when overwhelmed by reality . Not necessarily wrong. But not necessarily right *either*. There simply is no rational basis for it. It is useless. Its false sense of security can itself be harmful again. Purely exists as a coping fantasy. Same thing as conspiracy theorists (−1) , but with an opposite polarity (+1). Risen in popularity in late 2010s, due to an anxiety epidemic in young people caused by over-sheltering parents, for-profit fear media, over-prescription abuse, and several bad events (pandemic, wars, …). The real way to tell evil from stupid is: *Evil has a goal*. Its actions *converge* towards that. Stupid is incompetent. Its actions *diverge* (into chaos). Catch 1: Stupid people can *still* be useful pawns for evil people, and follow them. (See example.) Catch 2: There doesn’t *have* to be an evil person. It may be emergent behavior in a group. (Proof: Your body’s cells aren’t smart. Yet together they can act smart.) Usually it’s more complex, but that’s the gist. In the end, stupid is already harmful. It wastes resources and slows advancement down. That is evil. While evil is already stupid. As teamwork (being nice) is clearly an evolutionary advantage.
Text fits
Save
Cancel