Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
TL;DR Version: Every news outlet is owned by a billionaire or $100+ billion corporation. Every news outlet ignored or underplayed the Epstein story--not a single "journalist" (see: *company*) asked why the feds didn't try to strike a deal with Maxwell for the client list. We know the client list. Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and Alan "I kept My Underwear On" Dershowitz, Trump's attorney--none of them have been brought in for questioning. *** (NOT TLDR Version) Bloomberg is owned by billionaire Bloomberg. MSN is owned by Gates. Murdoch owns Fox News/Wall Street Journal. The Allbritton fam owns Politico. Carlos Slim has the largest stake in the NYTimes. Sumner Redstone owned ViacomCBS. Bezos owns The Washington Post... Disney owns ABC. Vanguard/Blackrock are the largest stakeholders of MSNBC. Turner controls CNN, along with 200 countries around the world. Other countries work similarly. The biggest publication in Belgium is owned by billionaire Van Thillio family... etc. Meanwhile, every news outlet is sponsored by Pfizer ads--notice zero news outlets asked why "the science changed" so many times. Why are you considered a "conspiracy theorist" and compared with flat-earthers if you ask these questions? If you have good answers to any of these questions, then it sounds like the Legacy Media is for you :) (Why did ABC and CBS (legacy media outlets) both censor the Epstein story and even fire a staffer for leaking the story?
Text fits
Save
Cancel