Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
A supposed sequel to the 1986 film 'Top Gun' which was not a horrible movie, but it was cliched, predictable and nothing like the Navy or aviation at all. A pure fantasy for the jingoistic armchair generals who would 'rah-rah' and cheer at the 1986 Libya air and sea war that (coincidentally) came that year, and later get their rocks off watching and listening to the 24/7 live TV and radio coverage of the drama in Iraq in 1991 and every war since. The film didn't faze or offend me. I was in the Navy during the time. Americans who never served thought it was as so 'apple pie' grand. It wasn't. Some critics bashed it, saying it glorified war. No, it didn't - there was no war in the plot. It was just an unrealistic fantasy, that's all. This sequel, now dubbed 'Top Gun: Maverick' is SAID to be out soon but it's been put off again and again. It's supposed to take place 36 years later. Well, everything has changed since 1986. As a veteran I can tell you that NOBODY serves that long in the service, let alone flies jet fighters. Even more, Tom Cruise himself turned down doing a sequel in the late 80s. If this film does come out, I hope it's a BOMB. It's preposterous, unrealistic, stupid and an idiotic pile of shit. Most of my Generation X has moved on, this ain't the 80s anymore. Since Cruise has tarnished his image and rep over the years, his career is declining AND he has a daughter begat by a dumb starfucker to feed, I guess this would be something to fall back on. Maybe.
Text fits
Save
Cancel