Skip to main content
Dictionary
Store
Blog
World
Help
Advertise
Chat
System Status
Information Collection Notice
Trademark Concerns
reCAPTCHA Privacy
Terms of Service
reCAPTCHA Terms
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Report a Bug
Data Request
Contact Us
Security
DMCA
© 1999–2026 Urban Dictionary ®
Mugs
Tees
Hoodies
Pro Customization
Create unique products with your own words and definitions
Preview
Personalize Your Design
Your Word
Your Definition
When you think of what the NFL would actually be like without Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers, you think of what it's like without Peyton and Eli Manning, and now Drew Brees, and you look at how dominant Tom Brady has become without them around. The same thing would likely happen with younger quarterbacks if Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers left today, as long as there is no stabilizing force to keep things balanced, you would have just one guy, one name, and you would forget all that came before him (the Joe Montana's, Dan Marino's, and some of the guys before them), and everyone else around him. That isn't always the good thing people think it would be if they actually made it happen, change doesn't always make things better/stronger, sometimes things were as good as they were going to get, then they weaken or break after the change is made in a way they wouldn't have if they had been left alone.
Text fits
Save
Cancel