What's on your mug?

A [person] using methods you [don]'t [understand] to solve problems you can't see

Layman: what beautiful day! Lawyer: NO! it's a horrible day filled with [legal] issues! But [fear] not, because I am reasonably convinced that we can [fix] the problem of the possible undermining of competition law in the UPC regime, that will manifest itself as the UPC not allowing competiton law defenses in 'hold up' standard essential patent cases as the basis for a [denial] of a preliminary injunction in a infringement [case] even if the proprietor has given an offer that is not nessecarily against the practice of giving licenses on FRAND (Fair Reasonable and [Non]-Discriminatory) terms, but none the less has rejected an offer from the alledged infringer that certainly does [fall] within the [scope] of FRAND terms, that is likely to appear because of the inherent risks of doctrinal isolation, by simply broadening the [scope] of the indispensability test, thus, not only allowing a competition law defense because the would-be licensee intends to offer a new product or service that the propritor does not provide and there is a potential consumer demand for this product or service, without there being any objectively justifiable reasons for the refusal and that the refusal must must entail an elimination of competition in a secondary market but also if the proprietor is dominant in the sector and the would be licensee gives an offer that falls within the [scope] of FRAND terms, [even] though it might be lower than what the proprietors usual fees are. Layman: The who the where and the what now?

This definition is too long for this mug.